Jagger et al used the sum of eye and motor responses to evaluate a patient with subarachnoid hemorrhage. This can help to identify a patient who may require more aggressive management. The authors are from the University of Virginia in Charlottesville.
NOTE: The parameters are similar to the Glasgow Coma Score without a verbal response component.
Parameters:
(1) eye opening response
(2) motor responses
(3) secondary complications (pneumonia, etc)
Parameter |
Finding |
Points |
---|---|---|
eye opening response |
spontaneous |
4 |
|
after verbal stimulation |
3 |
|
only with painful stimuli |
2 |
|
absent despite maximal stimuli |
1 |
motor response |
normal |
4 |
|
mild, focal deficit |
3 |
|
severe, focal deficit |
2 |
|
abnormal extensor or flexor posturing (severe global deficit) |
1 |
|
none even after painful stimuli; flaccid muscles |
1 |
where:
• The descriptions for eye opening response in Table 1(page 328) include none eye observations: 4 = immediate response to verbal stimulus; 3 = slightly impaired consciousness; 2 = incomplete arousal and reverts to prestimulus state when stimulus removed; 1 = does not speak with intelligible words.
total score =
= (points for eye opening response) + (points for motor response)
Interpretation:
• minimal score: 2
• maximal score: 8
• A score of 8 is normal while a score of 2 is associated with a moribund state.
• The rate of mortality at 6 months progressively increases as the score decreases. The presence of secondary complications increases mortality up to 20% compared to someone without complications.
• The rate of good recovery at 6 months progressively decreases as the score decreases. Secondary complications may significantly decrease the rate of recovery as well.
• Prevention of secondary complications can significantly improve outcome.
Purpose: To evaluate a patient with a subarachnoid hemorrhage using the prognostic score of Jagger et al.
Specialty: Neurology
Objective: severity, prognosis, stage
ICD-10: I60,