Questions about the review:
(1) understandable
(2) fair and objective
(3) insight and expertise on the part of the reviewer
(4) evaluated the purpose of the research
(5) evaluated the importance of subject
(6) evaluated the originality
(7) evaluated the study design
(8) evaluated the scientific arguments
(9) suggestions for improvement
(10) overall conclusion and/or recommendations
(11) structure of criticism
(12) comments have resulted in an improved paper
Responses for the original questionnaire are "Yes" or "No". For the implementation an expanded scale will be used.
In addition the authors gave a Likert-scale global assessment of the review:
|
Global Assessment
|
Score
|
|
bad
|
1
|
|
suboptimal
|
2
|
|
fair
|
3
|
|
good
|
4
|
|
exceptional
|
5
|
Each reviewer who provided comments should be evaluated.
