Hill et al reported a score for predicting perioperative mortality after pancreatectomy. This can help to identify a patient who may benefit from more aggressive management. The authors are from the University of Massachusetts.
NOTE: Ragulin-Coyne et al reported an updated version of this score.
Patient selection: pancreatectomy
Parameters:
(1) sex
(2) age in years
(3) Charlson score
(4) pancreatectomy type
(5) hospital volume for pancreatectomy
Parameter |
Finding |
Points |
sex |
female |
0 |
|
male |
1 |
age |
< 60 years |
0 |
|
60 to 79 years |
2 |
|
>= 80 years |
5 |
Charlson score |
0 or 1 |
0 |
|
2 |
1 |
|
>= 3 |
3 |
pancreatectomy type |
proximal |
2 |
|
distal |
0 |
|
not specified |
2 |
hospital volume |
<= 8 per year |
5 |
|
9 to 32 per year |
3 |
|
> 32 per year |
0 |
score =
= SUM(points for all 5 parameters)
Interpretation:
ª minimum score: 0
• maximum score: 16
• The higher the score the greater the risk of mortality.
Score |
Risk Group |
Mortality |
0 to 5 |
low |
2% |
6 to 9 |
intermediate |
6.2% |
>= 10 |
high |
13.9% |
If the data in Figure 1 is analyzed:
Score |
Percent |
0 |
0.5 |
1 |
0.8 |
2 |
1.0 |
3 |
1.4 |
4 |
2.0 |
5 |
2.8 |
6 |
3.8 |
7 |
5.0 |
8 |
6.8 |
9 |
9.0 |
10 |
11.5 |
11 |
14.1 |
12 |
17.2 |
13 |
26.7 |
14 |
27.6 |
15 |
39.5 |
Performance:
• The area under the ROC curve is 0.72.
Specialty: Anesthesiology, Surgery, general