Casanova et al developed a scoring system for identifying iron deficiency in pregnant women. This can be helpful in evaluating a pregnant woman when more specific laboratory tests are unavailable. The authors are from the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.
Pretest probability of iron deficiency: 50% (from page 460)
Parameters:
(1) hemoglobin
(2) RDW in percent
(3) gestational age in weeks
(4) combination of RDW and gestational age
Parameter |
Finding |
Points |
---|---|---|
hemoglobin |
>= 9.7 |
0 |
|
< 9.7 |
1 |
red blood cell distribution width (RDW) |
< 15 percent |
0 |
|
>= 15 percent |
1 |
gestational age |
>= 20 weeks |
0 |
|
< 20 weeks |
1 |
combination |
gestational age >= 20 OR RDW < 15 |
0 |
|
gestational age < 20 weeks AND RDW >= 15 |
1 |
where:
• Looking at the data in Table 1 (page 462), I am not sure why MCV did not appear in the final model. It would seem that an MCV < 80 fL would have identified the iron deficient women.
total score =
= SUM(points for all 4 parameters)
Interpretation:
• minimum score: 0
• maximum score: 4
• The cutoff to identify iron deficiency anemia was >= 2.
Performance:
• The specificity is good (88%), but the sensitivity is mediocre (45%). 74% of patients were correctly classified.
• How well the score would work in a population with a high frequency of thalassemia is uncertain. The authors claim that the score would be useful in resource-poor areas of the world. Unfortunately some of these areas also have high levels of thalassemia.
Purpose: To evaluate a pregnant woman for iron deficiency anemia using the scoring system of Casanova et al.
Specialty: Hematology Oncology, Clinical Laboratory, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Pedatrics, Surgery, general, Gastroenterology
Objective: laboratory tests, criteria for diagnosis
ICD-10: D50, O99.0,