The decision whether or not to perform surgery for a condition requires balancing possible risks and benefits. Stylopoulos et al used a model to help decide whether a patient with paraesophageal hernia should undergo surgery or should be observed.
Observation strategy: Surgery is performed only if the patient is symptomatic. This is assumed to be an emergency operation.
Interventional strategy: Perform elective surgery now to correct the problem.
Parameters:
(1) incidence rate of disease progression (assumed to be constant)
(2) life expectancy
(3) mortality rate for emergency surgery
(4) mortality rate for elective surgery
life-time risk for acute symptoms requiring surgery =
= 1 - ((1 - (incidence rate))^(years of life expectancy))
risk of mortality with observation strategy =
= (life-time risk for acute symptoms) * (mortality rate for emergency surgery)
Comparison of Risk |
Recommendation |
mortality for observation >> risk for elective surgery |
perform surgery |
mortality of the two strategies comparable |
discuss options with patient |
mortality for observation << risk for elective surgery |
observe |
Limitations:
• The model assumes that the incidence rate of disease progression is constant.
• The model assumes that the risk of serious complications for surgery is constant and does not increase with age.
• It is assumed that the person will have the average life expectancy for race and gender.
Purpose: To decide whether a person with an asymptomatic anatomic condition that may or may not progress should have surgery or be observed.
Objective: selection
ICD-10: ,