Bailey et al used a grading scheme for evaluating surgical wounds after hernia surgery. The authors are from the Royal South Hampshire Hospital in Southampton, England.
Major Finding |
Additional Findings |
Grade |
---|---|---|
normal healing |
|
0 |
normal healing with mild bruising or erythema |
|
I |
|
some bruising |
Ia |
|
considerable bruising |
Ib |
|
mild erythema |
Ic |
erythema plus other signs of inflammation |
|
II |
|
at 1 point |
IIa |
|
around sutures |
IIb |
|
along wound |
IIc |
|
around wound |
IId |
clear or hemoserous discharge |
|
III |
|
at 1 point only; <= 2 cm |
IIIa |
|
along wound; > 2 cm |
IIIb |
|
large volume |
IIIc |
|
prolonged drainage (> 3 days) |
IIId |
pus |
|
IV |
|
at 1 point only; <= 2 cm |
IVa |
|
along wound; > 2 cm |
IVb |
deep or severe wound infection |
with or without tissue breakdown or hematoma requiring aspiration |
V |
where:
• Signs of inflammation would include warmth (calor) and swelling (edema).
Grades IV and V are considered major complications.
Purpose: To grade a surgical wound using the Southampton scheme.
Specialty: Infectious Diseases
Objective: severity, prognosis, stage, complications
ICD-10: K40-K46,